What should an rater consider when writing comments for an NCO's evaluation?

When writing comments for an NCO's evaluation, it is crucial for the rater to consider the impact of the NCO's performance on the unit and mission success. This approach emphasizes the significance of the NCO's contributions in relation to the broader goals and objectives of the unit. An effective evaluation should detail how the individual's actions and achievements align with the unit's mission, demonstrating their value and effectiveness in their role.

Focusing on the NCO's impact ensures that the evaluation is not merely a reflection of personal opinions or sentiments but is grounded in concrete performance metrics that can lead to actionable insights. Moreover, emphasizing outcomes helps provide context to the NCO's performance, reinforcing the importance of accountability and operational effectiveness in a military environment.

Where other options fall short—such as prioritizing personal feelings, providing vague feedback, or simply considering tenure in the position—they do not provide a comprehensive view of the NCO's true performance and contributions. Evaluations should be objective and based on measurable impacts rather than subjective impressions or unrelated factors. This ensures that the evaluation process is fair, merit-based, and aligned with the core values and goals of the military organization.