What can an NCO do if there is a discrepancy in the evaluation process?

An NCO can initiate a formal inquiry or appeal in response to a discrepancy in the evaluation process because this action ensures that the issue is documented and formally addressed. The evaluation process is critical for professional development, career progression, and maintaining a fair system, so when discrepancies arise, it is essential that they are handled through appropriate channels. This formal approach provides an opportunity to investigate the matter thoroughly, gather evidence, and resolve the issue in a structured manner.

By initiating a formal inquiry or appeal, the NCO not only seeks to correct their own evaluation but also helps maintain the integrity of the evaluation process for all members of the unit. This emphasizes accountability and upholds the standards expected in military evaluations, fostering a culture of fairness and transparency.

The other choices do not adequately address the importance of resolving discrepancies in a formal manner. Ignoring the issue can lead to unresolved discrepancies impacting career advancement, while informal discussions with peers may not achieve the necessary resolution or change process. Requesting immediate reassignment would typically not be an appropriate response to an evaluation discrepancy, as it does not directly address the underlying issue in the evaluation itself.