What action can an NCO take if they disagree with their evaluation?

Submitting a rebuttal is the appropriate course of action for an NCO who disagrees with their evaluation. This process allows the non-commissioned officer to formally express their concerns and provide a counter-narrative to specific points within the evaluation that they feel are inaccurate or unjust. A rebuttal is a constructive way to engage with the evaluation system, ensuring that the NCO's perspective is documented and considered by their superiors.

This option emphasizes the importance of open communication and accountability in the evaluation process. It gives the NCO an opportunity to defend their performance and rectify any misunderstandings without fundamentally altering the integrity of the evaluation process. This strategy can also be beneficial for addressing any potential biases or errors within the evaluation, which ultimately contributes to the overall fairness and effectiveness of the performance assessment system.

Other actions, such as requesting a new rater or ignoring the evaluation, may not effectively address the disagreement and could lead to further complications in professional relationships and career progression. Revising the evaluation is not typically in the hands of the NCO; it is the responsibility of the rater or reviewing authority. Thus, submitting a rebuttal is the most constructive and accepted method for addressing concerns with an evaluation.